Comments on: Miley Cyrus (Hannah Montana) Posed Topless for Vanity Fair

By: Dayna

Dayna — Sun, 10 Aug 2008 16:22:29 +0000

just let the girl live ! she is not the only girl that has every posed topless for a camera. and besides shes not really top less.. how do you know that she isnt wearing a tube top underneath it or a strapless bra ? none knows but her and them !

By: Jasmine

Jasmine — Sun, 22 Jun 2008 20:40:21 +0000

I love hannah montana

i cant beleive this!

but i still think shes the best

whatever she does

By: Dave

Dave — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:46:20 +0000

Wow people, for 1 you cant even see it, 2 just because she did something like this, which is hardly even considered a nude photo shoot, does not mean that she’s going to turn out like brttany and lindsay.

By: omg...again

omg...again — Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:32:25 +0000

omg she may only be 15 but it was her decision and she made it…so just get over it..every1 makes decisions they regret…its not like child stars can stay children forever…

By: miley topless

miley topless — Wed, 04 Jun 2008 10:51:44 +0000

[...] topless for Vanity Fair, parents and Disney claim ‘photographer took advantage’. Pics included.http://www.suburbanoblivion.com/2008/04/27/miley-cyrus-hannah-montana-posed-topless-for-vanity-fair/oceanUP: Miley Cyrus Poses Topless For Vanity Fairit&39s true. this story is on ET..they went behind [...]

By: cassidy

cassidy — Wed, 28 May 2008 03:55:20 +0000

this is stupid i think you should be topples showing everything kissing a girl

By: Andre

Andre — Sat, 10 May 2008 06:36:40 +0000

It’s not a big deal people! It’s not like shes nude. People are makeing a big deal then it is. It looks really differnt in a good way.

By: J

Fri, 09 May 2008 19:35:30 +0000

She looks like she just got out of bed, without any jammies. Like she’s been having sex. That’s inappropriate for a 15 year old girl, I would say.

I heard that her family was there, that they all liked the picture and thought it was quite ‘artsy’, until Disney got ticked. I don’t know if that’s true or not.

By: miley cyrus topless

miley cyrus topless — Thu, 08 May 2008 03:48:50 +0000

[...] topless for Vanity Fair, parents and Disney claim ‘photographer took advantage’. Pics included.http://www.suburbanoblivion.com/2008/04/27/miley-cyrus-hannah-montana-posed-topless-for-vanity-fair/Miley Cyrus Topless Photos in Vanity Fair: UGH Nasty! Bumpshack.comI returned from my weekend get [...]

By: giovannie gooch

giovannie gooch — Tue, 06 May 2008 06:52:24 +0000

ok see i dont no what to say about that i love her songs and the show but y? wood you do that she’s a lil girl shes a baby and y WOOD BILLY RAM LAT HER DO THAT NOW SHE GOT NO SHOW and i just dont no guys i love hannah montana but i dont no wow not cool hannah ps i hop you get off this shit

By: Karen (Pomtini)

Karen (Pomtini) — Fri, 02 May 2008 13:31:40 +0000

What I don’t get is the point of the picture… it’s the tone of it, really, not so much that she isn’t nude or topless. It must be difficult to be that age and in the spotlight all the time… unfortunately this seems to be the natural progression in Hollywood. I’ve noticed that her stylists seem to be dressing her much “older” than she is, honestly a lot of the time at events/ red carpets etc, outside of her TV show, she’s dressed much too maturely. My 2 cents anyway.

Does anybody remember the uproar with Brooke Shields in Pretty Baby and Endless Love? I guess she turned out fairly well adjusted despite all that!

By: Peggy

Peggy — Thu, 01 May 2008 16:52:39 +0000

I have to say that I don’t see what the big deal is about this picture. She isn’t “nude” and to be quite frank, the picture isn’t that great. Her skin looks pale and jaundiced and her hair looks unkept.

Although, I can see how Disney and fans could see it as a “first step of things to come.”

I can totally understand that.

By: wornoutwoman

wornoutwoman — Thu, 01 May 2008 14:45:50 +0000

Man I’m so tired of young girls trying to grow up too fast and sending the message to our young that it’s okay to pose and show skin….at 15!@#

Not that I think she’s a natural beauty anyway, but I thought her charm was in her good girl appearance. If she starts and continues down this path, she’s not going to have much to show for herself.

And as far as the family’s comment about the photographer’s actions…..SHE’S 15!!! and underage….someone from her family should have been there to protect her to begin with. So whose fault if the photographer did take advantage??? The parent’s and the photographers!!

By: Pendullum

Pendullum — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:45:07 +0000

The smeared make up and looking like she is trashed is another part that I just do not get….
The topless thing does not bother me as much as the lipstick that looks as though she has just had some heavy duty make out session…

By: Lela

Lela — Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:37:18 +0000

It’s too bad that photographer had to do that to Miley’s reputation and image. Of course, Vanity Fair didn’t help by only showing the questionable aspect of the image either.

By: Summer

Summer — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:28:25 +0000

I think the worst part is how much of a baby face she has in the photo. I mean if they at least tried to do her make up to look like an adult it would still be bad, but they seem to be flaunting the “little girl nude’ image. I wonder if the photographer’s computer needs to be searched for images he shouldn’t ahve.

By: Lin

Lin — Tue, 29 Apr 2008 00:38:33 +0000

It’s amazing to me the number of people who think this photo shoot is innocent, and have no problem with it whatsoever. She’s 15!

Videos online have shown Billy Ray, wife and child leaving the photo shoot just prior to the taking of the last photo. Bad move Billy.

Further reports say that when Billy saw the photo, he was “mortified”. Disney is not happy at all either.

People/parents just don’t understand how children are being sexualized at very young ages, and how marketers, advertisers etc are targeting young children with inappropriate products, and they’re taking it right to the bank.

By: LCDLBA

LCDLBA — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:59:29 +0000

PLEASE People! She is wrapped in fabric!! She isn’t running around showing her ta-ta’s to everyone here! This is no different than wearing a strapless dress are worse yet a strapless bikini. There is no skin but her shoulders showing in this picture! I just don’t see what all of the fuss is. I bet most little girls who look up to this young lady, see their friends and family wear less around the swimming pool! Good heavens!

By: JayMonster

JayMonster — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:22:43 +0000

You can tell where people found this story based on how it is portrayed. First of all she is not nude (though admittedly it is “suggestive” nor is she even actually topless (not that the yellow journalism sites will actually say that. The biggest problem here is (it seems) having Ann Liebowitz as the photographer, as she is not exactly adverse to controversy.

If it were not for people (read: Trash Mags and sites) making such a big deal over this, and “suggesting” more I don’t think anybody would have cared. These pictures were going in Vanity Fair, not exactly a popular tween magazine.

By: Queen of Shake Shake

Queen of Shake Shake — Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:53:49 +0000

I think it’s a sign of the strange and weird sickness we as a society have with sex. We are one seriously fucked up society when it comes to healthy ideas of women and sexuality.